Skip to main content
Back to goshuin.com
Goshuingoshuin database

Goshuin Database Coverage Across Japan

The five most documented prefectures hold 72.9% of all prefecture-linked records in this snapshot.

These charts show where the public database is deep, where it is thin, and which questions this snapshot cannot answer.

By

Goshuin Database Research

Snapshot

July 26, 2026 at 12:01 PM

Use

Distribution of 255 prefecture-linked records across 25 represented prefectures. Focus a bar to read its value.
More recordsFocus a bar for detailsFewer
Public records
260
Temples represented
183
Prefectures with linked records
25 / 47
Reading rule
Every figure describes this database snapshot, not the prevalence or frequency of goshuin in Japan.

Where records are most concentrated

The ranking starts with the prefectures that have the most linked records. It shows where editorial coverage is strongest and where there is still little to read.

Tokyo and Kyoto currently lead this ranking.

A longer bar means that more records are linked to that prefecture in this snapshot. It does not measure cultural importance or how often goshuin are issued.

Bars open the underlying prefecture view

Which prefectures are represented

Each mark stands for one of Japan’s prefectures. Vermillion indicates that at least one public record is linked to that prefecture.

Represented
25 / 47
Not yet represented
22
Public record present No linked record yet

From the live database

What sits behind a count

A bar is made of individual records like these. Each one keeps its own record ID, issuing place, image, and verification state.

How quickly the records concentrate

Starting with the most documented prefecture, the line adds one prefecture at a time. A steep opening means a small group holds much of the published collection.

Cumulative share of public records by prefecture

Prefectures are ordered from most to fewest public records. Use Tab to move through the points and read each prefecture's rank, record count, and cumulative share.

Interpretation

The first five prefectures account for 72.9% of prefecture-linked records.

Focus or point to any mark to read its rank and cumulative share. The flatter tail is made up of prefectures with only a few published records.

Temple reach and record depth are not the same

Two prefectures can hold similar record totals for different reasons: many represented temples or several designs from fewer temples.

Temples represented compared with public goshuin records

Each point is a prefecture. Both axes use a logarithmic scale so that small and large prefecture aggregates remain visible. Use Tab to move through the points and read each prefecture's exact counts.

Temple reach and record depth are separate.

Focus or point to a mark to compare its exact counts. Logarithmic axes keep the smaller values visible.

Depth per represented temple

Dividing record count by represented temples shows where the database has documented multiple designs per place.

  1. 01Hyogo4
  2. 02Chiba2.25
  3. 03Fukui2
  4. 04Shizuoka2
  5. 05Kanagawa1.81
  6. 06Hiroshima1.67
  7. 07Kyoto1.47
  8. 08Osaka1.44
  9. 09Tokyo1.42
  10. 10Nara1.31

Derived measure

Public records per represented temple

Focus or point to a row to isolate it. A higher ratio means more distinct designs have been documented per represented temple, not that the temples issue more goshuin.

Verification and making methods

The final pair of charts reports the verified share of public records and the making methods currently tagged.

Verification share

Public records carrying curator or temple verification.

Verified
260 · 100%
Other verification states
0

Making-method records

Public records grouped by the creation methods currently tagged in the database.

  • Handwritten203
  • Paper cutting21
  • Printed14
  • Special Printing5
  • Embroidered2

How the numbers were made

The page reads live, public Goshuin Database aggregates. It ranks prefecture counts, adds those counts for the concentration curve, and divides designs by represented temples for the depth ratio. The scatter plot uses logarithmic axes so prefectures with smaller counts remain visible.

Limits of this snapshot

The public data does not include a census of every issuing temple, a historical time series, issuance frequency, visitor frequency, or a denominator for true completeness. A missing record marks a research gap. It does not mean that a goshuin does not exist.

Public data sources

get_goshuin_database_stats
get_goshuin_database_prefectures
get_goshuin_database_homepage

Snapshot generated

July 26, 2026 at 12:01 PM

Regenerated weekly. Failed runs retain the last successful snapshot.

Suggested citation

Goshuin Database Research. (July 26, 2026). “Goshuin Database Coverage Across Japan.” https://database.goshuin.com/en/research/coverage

Read the complete prefecture data table
Public Goshuin Database coverage aggregate for every represented prefecture
RankPrefectureGoshuinTemplesGoshuin / templeCumulative share
1Tokyo71501.4227.8%
2Kyoto56381.4749.8%
3Kanagawa29161.8161.2%
4Nara17131.3167.8%
5Osaka1391.4472.9%
6Wakayama11101.177.3%
7Chiba942.2580.8%
8Tochigi761.1783.5%
9Gifu55185.5%
10Hiroshima531.6787.5%
11Fukui42289%
12Hyogo41490.6%
13Nagano44192.2%
14Shizuoka42293.7%
15Ishikawa33194.9%
16Mie33196.1%
17Yamanashi22196.9%
18Aichi11197.3%
19Hokkaido11197.6%
20Iwate11198%
21Kumamoto11198.4%
22Nagasaki11198.8%
23Niigata11199.2%
24Saitama11199.6%
25Shiga111100%